Recent Communications — Petitioner & Union of India
2015–2018'This establishes clear institutional knowledge and responsibility at the highest levels.'
Full textFeaturing all exhibited documents, court judgments, diplomatic correspondences, and case files relating to the UAE Case — a comprehensive archive spanning 1996 to present.
'This establishes clear institutional knowledge and responsibility at the highest levels.'
Full textFor the complete detailed timeline with all 25 entries (Jan 2013 – May 2018), please visit: Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms Timeline — Full Document
The arrest and detention were against the basic principles of law. The Court expressed shock while noticing that a victim who sought police help from trespassers was arrested and detained by the police.
The Judgment of the Legal Court of First Instance was pronounced on 10-04-1996. The Judgment Creditor and his brother were acquitted. The Court directed the authorities to prosecute the policeman involved in illegal activities. Material findings included: the policeman and Hassan Saeed committed offences of trespass and assault; the Judgment Creditor had only exercised his legal right; police unjustifiably protected the law breakers; and the police framed false charges to save face.
The final Judgment of the Supreme Court was rendered on 19-05-1996. The Supreme Court declared the Judgment Creditor was totally innocent. The case was wholly false, baseless and fabricated by the police for personal gains. Referring to principles of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court observed that a person dying while protecting his freedom is considered a 'martyr'. The Apex Court ordered a thorough investigation into police abuses.
The deportation order was prepared with false and fabricated statements, with intention to save face and avoid paying court ordered reparations. The fraud was committed by Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed, then Head of the State Security Apparatus, who authorized Administrative Decision No. 227/1996. This case is a blueprint for institutional betrayal — forged court orders were used to forcibly dispossess the investor, in direct violation of domestic and international law.
These documents forged a story, creating a false criminal history, polishing a crime-free facade. It killed his credibility, buried court verdicts, and ensured his permanent ban from the country.
This deprived him of the benefits of his lawfully obtained decrees, compelled him to abandon his established business concerns, real estate holdings, and other investments in the UAE. His companies, valued at over $100 million, were dismantled with surgical precision. Over 800 real estate properties linked to the UAE's elite were seized, their inventories looted, and corporate records erased through systemic fraud.
So long as the forged records remain concealed, the perpetrators remain unpunished, and the court's judgment remains nullified by fraud, this case stands as a lasting indictment.
The Judgment Creditor fought for justice by invoking the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court found merit in the case and suggested that the Delhi High Court could be approached under Article 226. The Delhi High Court by its judgment dated 20-11-1997, directed the Government of India to settle the issue within two months.
After filing the 'Whistleblower lawsuit' in Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi, a representation on 24-11-1997 on the proposed Extradition Treaty with UAE was submitted to the Ministry of External Affairs. A copy was handed over to the then President of India Shri K.R. Narayanan during his official visit to Kerala in 1999. India ratified the treaty with the UAE in 2000 but a country cannot extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty.
On reaching India in 1996, Mr Jabir had taken the documented evidence of pain and suffering of hundreds of Al-Wathba prisoners to the United Nations, Geneva and other international NGOs. Read the full account: 'Al Wathba Central Prison — Culture of Deception & Secrecy'
Pressure was exerted on his head, neck and all over the body, his hands tied behind his back and feet tied together, blindfolded, mouth and nose shut tight. This savage torture took place in Abu Dhabi in 1995 to extort money from a bona fide investor. The victim was taken to Abu Dhabi Central Hospital emergency — treatment was made without removing the shackles. He was subsequently admitted at Hinduja Hospital Mumbai and treated by multiple specialists including a psychiatrist.
Read his testimonial: 'The Serious Consequences — My Prison Life'
| # | Exhibit | Description | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exhibit a1; b1 | Judgment (Legal Court of First Instance) Ministry of Justice, Abu Dhabi, UAE | |
| 2 | Exhibit a2; b2 | Judgment (Final, Legal Court of Appeal) Ministry of Justice, Abu Dhabi, UAE | |
| 3 | Exhibit a3; b3 | Deportation Order — General Directorate Police, Abu Dhabi, UAE | |
| 4 | Exhibit a4; b4 | 'No Entry to UAE' Endorsement in the Passport | |
| 5 | Exhibit a5 | High Court of Delhi, Appellate Civil Jurisdiction: 20/11/1997 | |
| 6 | Exhibit (a)1 | Representation on India-UAE Extradition Treaty | |
| 7 | Exhibit (a)2 | Flashback & Recognition — India-UAE Extradition Treaty Article | |
| 8 | Exhibit (b)1 | Letter from Mr. George Titus (Co-Founder, UAE Exchange) | |
| 9 | Exhibit (b)2 | Letter from Mr. Abdulla Khoori, Emirati Citizen | |
| 10 | Exhibit (a)1 | Hospital Register Emergency Department, Abu Dhabi | |
| 11 | Exhibit (b)2 | Hospital Register Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai | |
| 12 | Exhibit a1 | Ambassador of India, Abu Dhabi — UAE: 21/09/1998 | |
| 13 | Exhibit a2 | NHRC To Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi: 25/06/1998 | |
| 14 | Exhibit a3 | Secretary to Minister of State, MEA: 29/01/1998 | |
| 15 | Exhibit a4 | H.H. Faisal, Govt-Ras Al Khaimah, UAE | |
| 16 | Exhibit a5 | Secretary to Minister of State, MEA: 25/06/1999 | |
| 17 | Exhibit a6 | Fax Message to UAE Ambassador, New Delhi: 23/10/1999 | |
| 18 | Exhibit a7 | To Minister of State, Foreign Affairs, UAE: 31/03/1999 | |
| 19 | Exhibit (a)1 | Secretary to Embassy of India, Abu Dhabi — UAE: 21/12/1996 | |
| 20 | Exhibit (a)2 | Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer to NHRC: 4/03/1997 | |
| 21 | Exhibit (a)3 | Centre for Human Rights, United Nations, Geneva: 28/02/1997 | |
| 22 | Exhibit (a)4 | Prime Minister's Office, New Delhi: 15/06/1998 | |
| 23 | Exhibit (a)5 | Smt. Vasundhara Raje, Minister of State for External Affairs: 16/06/1998 | |
| 24 | Exhibit (a)6 | O. Rajagopal, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha: 19/06/1998 | |
| 25 | Exhibit (a)7 | Commonwealth Secretariat, Political Affairs, London: 22/06/1998 | |
| 26 | Exhibit (a)8 | Shri. I.K. Gujral, Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha: 23/06/1998 | |
| 27 | Exhibit (a)9 | Amnesty International, Secretariat, London: 16/08/1999 | |
| 28 | Exhibit (a)10 | Non Resident Keralites' Affairs Dept, Govt of Kerala: 18/12/1999 | |
| 29 | Exhibit (a)11 | Secretary to Minister of State, MEA: 07/09/2000 | |
| 30 | Exhibit (a)12 | B-diary Proceedings — High Court of Delhi 2003–2007 | |
| 31 | Exhibit (a)13 | WP(C) No.6149/1998 — Delhi High Court Judgment 19/09/2007 | |
| 32 | Exhibit (a)14 | RTI Application to MEA, New Delhi — 11 Jul 2012 | |
| 33 | Exhibit (a)15 | MEA under RTI No. RTI/551/763/2012 — 26 Sep 2012 | |
| 34 | Exhibit (a)16 | Embassy of India, Abu Dhabi under RTI — 26 Nov 2012 | |
| 35 | Exhibit (a)17 | Indo-Gulf Reparation — Timeline Submissions & Responses 2018 | |
| 36 | Exhibit (a)18 | Publication Page — Jabir Case Exhibits & Features |