ENFORCEMENT OF UAE JUDGMENTS: TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION
Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)
The petitioner, who is a UAE torture survivor of inside the regime’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a total SIX times of ‘Judgment Creditor’ from the
Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, UAE, and India, still frustrated in the course of enforcing his judgments. He is now aimed to take his case to the next level of Courts, the "International Court of Justice
and Arbitral Tribunals".
We need your active support to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit
fraud and other henious acts to avoid honoring their obligations. ...
Please visit "A
PORTFOLIO OF UAE-INDIA JUDGMENTS FOR SALE!"
STATEMENT ON THE OCCASION OF THE 25TH YEAR OF GANG-ROBBERY, KIDNAPPING
AND BRUTAL TORTURE BY ABU DHABI POLICE!
"4 UAE Judgments and 2 Indian Judgments in favour of an Indian origin, UAE Investor, apart from embezzlement of his property and assets worth above $100m US dollars by the UAE administration. 25 years have elapsed and still unsettled". ...
" Chase The Trails Of 25-Year ‘UAE Fugitive" 
EVIDENTIARY PRESENTATION IN SUPPORT OF SYSTEMIC FRAUD BY THE UAE
ADMINISTRATION AGAINST AN INDIAN INVESTOR
"This update comprises voluminous communications—now public—between the Judgment Creditor, Mr. Jabir, and several
Indian political and diplomatic authorities whose responses are marked by consistent negligence and duplicity"
SYSTEMIC IMPUNITY AND ENFORCEMENT FAILURE IN THE UAE: THE UAE CASE THAT SHAMES THE SYSTEM:
This case underscores a significant breakdown in rule-of-law principles within the UAE justice system.
Despite multiple enforceable decisions by the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi in favour of an Indian-origin investor, justice has remained elusive. Crimes include severe criminal conduct by Abu Dhabi police officials — ranging from armed robbery and torture to attempted murder and document forgery — with the involvement of Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, both as a principal wrongdoer and as the de facto head of state.
In his administrative capacity, Sheikh Mohamed is further accused of orchestrating contempt of court and racially motivated embezzlement. While enforceable remedies exist under UAE law, including detention and asset seizure against a Judgment Debtor, these measures remain unexecuted. The total damages claimed now exceed several billion dollars. The case raises critical concerns regarding institutional accountability and judicial independence in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).
INDIA UAE DIPLOMACY - JUSTICE ON TRIAL:-
Back in India, the ‘legal fight’ for the enforcement of Judgments’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi.
The Delhi High Court which had envisaged action on the part of the Government of India, on the issues involved in the Writ Petition No. 6149 of 1998 [Judgment, Delhi High Court - 1998].
The execution, the Judicial proceeding, will complete only when the ‘Decree Holder’ gets his properties back and compensation for the damages awarded to him as per the Legal Judgments and Orders, apart from a long list of embezzlement of funds and outright fraud.
It’s High Time for the Union of India and the UAE Government to Come Out of its Hideouts, Face the Facts and Uphold the Laws of the Land!
The Union of India is Doing an Unpardonable Mistake of Dragging the Case for a Long Period of 26 Years to Date, Despite a Portfolio of Six Legal Judgments, from UAE and Indian Courts, Apart from ‘Contempt of Courts’ and Unlawful Tactics.
In a letter dated 29-04-2018 the Union of India asked the Petitioner as to what action shall be taken to resolve the case! [The Authentic Reply to the Union of India, dated 12-05-2018'].
'INDO-GULF REPARATION MECHANISMS’
“The establishments of institutional arrangements for the welfare of ‘Overseas Indian Community’, as highlighted by the Government of India, are intentionally deceptive, untruthful and purport to demonstrate that there are procedural remedies or tactics.
Serious failures and inadequacies to comply with statutory or regulatory obligations on the part of both the Ministries, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) & the ‘Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs’ (MOIA) now stand proved by the subsequent communications received by the petitioner from the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India”. 'TIMELINE HIGHLIGHTING SUBMISSIONS & RESPONSES'
In this context the observation of Hillary Clinton on strength and money as essentials linked with Human Rights could be usefully extracted. They read:“Strength, Money, and Knowledge – we cannot do anything without them”.
Reminder to the Government of India [MEA], dated July 16, 2014
The Government of India is duty bound to safeguard the interests of its citizen who was victimized by Abu Dhabi, UAE, the receiving state. These actions and omissions on the part of the Government is contrary to the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ particularly Article 5, enforced from 19-3-1967. Download full text: "Reminder to the Ministry of External Affairs, dated July 16, 2014"
Many institutions, persons who had occasion to look into the petitioner's grievances had written to the Ministry. The letters are available herewith for ready reference.
(View Some of the Responses from Authorities and personalities in the matter of Mr. Jabir) ; View Responses to a whistleblowing platform (uaeprison.com): Responses from viewers.
(Last updated: 10th Dec, 2020)
‘Let's Stand Up Together For Justice & Human Dignity' Enforce UAE Judgments!
[]
|
